Producers’ Purchasing Preferences in 2017
Editor’s note: Dr. William Secor is an economist for CoBank and a former clinical professor with Purdue University’s Center for Food and Agricultural Business. He played an integral role in the 2017 Large Commercial Producer Project during his tenure at the university.
In the 2017 Large Commercial Producer Project, Purdue University asked farmers to rank product performance, price, and supplier relationship when purchasing crop inputs. The result: Most farmers have clear favorites.
Product performance and price are the most important attributes for most farmers when it comes time to buy crop inputs. For different types of inputs, the ranking of these two may change, but both beat out supplier relationship for most buyers.
That said, it’s important to note that relationship is still most important for a sizable segment of farmers.
For seed purchases, more than half of crop producers rank performance as most important, followed by price and relationship. However, just over 20 percent of farmers ranked relationship most important, followed by price and performance. The third large segment of rankings (approximately 13 percent of respondents) put price first, followed by performance and relationship.
For crop protection, a similar pattern emerges with the same three rankings representing the largest three segments. The product performance-price-relationship is first with about 45 percent of respondents choosing this ranking. The next largest segment (22 percent) ranks price first followed by performance and relationship. Last, just over 15 percent of respondents ranked relationship first with price second and performance third.
Capital equipment preferences follows the same pattern again with the performance-price-relationship ranking representing the largest segment (about 40 percent). Next, price-performance-relationship farmers account for a third of respondents. Finally, relationship-price-performance farmers represent only 10 percent of respondents.
Fertilizer proves to be an outlier with price and performance playing a more important role. The largest segment of farmers rank price first followed by performance and relationship (39 percent). The next-largest segment puts performance ahead of price with relationship last (23 percent). The third-largest segment (17 percent) puts price first, relationship second, and performance third. This emphasis on price, which is first priority in over half of all respondents, is likely due the commodity nature of fertilizer.
This data allows farm suppliers to better create value for farmers by segmenting them. Delivering and communicating the right benefits to the right segments is a win-win for farmers and their suppliers. On average, across all products, approximately one in five farmers value relationships over price and performance. Just under half of farmers place performance ahead of price and relationship. The remainder (just over a third) prioritize price over performance and relationship.
Shifting gears to dealer and retailer attributes, we see similar patterns. Four areas are important for crop farmers when selecting dealers and retailers: service quality, service availability, past supplier experience, and salesperson relationship. The most important was service quality, with over half of respondents ranking it their top priority. Service availability (52 percent first or second priority) and past supplier experience (39 percent first or second priority) both rank ahead of salesperson relationship, which comes in fourth with 30 percent of respondents ranking it first or second.
These results also mesh with responses from a related question in this year’s Large Commercial Producer Survey that asks why a farmer has changed suppliers. Prices were the most common reason followed by service problems and a change in staff or salesperson. When working with farmers, agricultural dealers and retailers should focus on these attributes as key areas of focus and differentiation.
Check out our upcoming programs and exceed your professional development goals! Position yourself to excel in your career by attending one of our professional development workshops. Each educational program focuses on different business topics and concepts related to the agribusiness industry you serve, including: marketing, sales, finance, talent management and strategy. Not sure which one is right for you? Let’s chat!
Tags: Agribusiness, Agricultural Retail, Buying Preferences, Crops, Decision Making, Farm, Farm Inputs, Food, Inputs, Large Commercial Producer Project, Large Commercial Producer Survey, Livestock, National Conference for Food and Agribusiness, Production Agriculture, Purchasing, Research, Sales
Producers’ Purchasing Preferences in 2017
As salespeople, we thrive on building relationships, expanding our network, interacting with our customers and growing our business. I don’t want to say it’s the thrill of the chase, because I hate the analogy that customers are to be preyed upon. Each and every one of our customers is more than just a number to us — they are a face, a name, and a story with a family, goals and desires. We don’t secure a new customer and call it a day. Securing a sale marks the start of a new (or renewed) relationship.
Looking back on her career thus far, Michelle Klieger, a 2015 MS-MBA alumna, views her MS-MBA degrees similarly to the art of tying shoes or braiding hair. Her degrees have served as a common thread, weaving their way into forming her career and helping her achieve her goals in many ways.
It was clear before and even more so now after the events of the last 12+ months — data-driven decision making is crucial for companies aiming to remain profitable and competitive in today’s markets. However, beyond simply basing decision making on data, companies must take this a step further and fully embrace the concept of competitive intelligence to truly be successful. In the food and agribusiness industry, we are no exception to this rule.