Managing in a New Era
Author: Dr. Scott Downey, Director and Professor
For many years, we have talked about how sales and marketing have evolved over time. If we look at this historically, we can consider how the sales and marketing process focused on explaining product features because of the number of innovations in manufacturing in the early 1900’s. Sales activities were not distinct from marketing. Sales was about promoting a product, similar to what we think of today as advertising. Management styles at this time were focused on humans as machines. Managers were “bosses” who reported to other bosses and sales was a repetitive behavior of informing customers and potential customers about product capabilities and taking orders.
Continuing with this historical perspective, the expanded manufacturing for WWII meant that a glut of similar products began to appear in the marketplace. Manufacturers did not have the time or resources to develop new product innovations quickly. They converted the manufacturing of guns, rations, uniforms and equipment into manufacturing the necessities of the time: vacuums, canned food, clothes and other goods. Similar products in the marketplace meant companies had to sharpen their ability to promote their products. This period saw the dawn of the advertising age, along with an explosion of selling activity needed to move those goods, which we call the “Sales Era.” With more sophisticated communication techniques like local radio and television, sales became a persuasive activity.
Management began to take the measurement and process perspectives of the industrial era and incorporate them into the command and control operations familiar from successful war ventures. For the first time, sales was a skill that could be taught. Sales managers taught salespeople about “beating the pavement” and “not taking no for an answer”. They were also taught that if a customer did not have a need, it was the salesperson’s job to “create” one. Salespeople were the hunters and customers were the prey. Sales became manipulative, and as soon as customers had an opportunity to buy without being sold something, they took it. By the end of the sales era, the title of “salesman” (nearly always male) was so tarnished that salespeople began being called representatives, field marketers, customer service technicians…anything but salespeople.
As online purchasing took hold in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, companies like Amazon began training consumers to realize that they could purchase nearly anything without ever leaving their recliner. This perspective transferred into the business world, too, as the sales process moved into the “Market Era”, or the “Customer Era.” Sales processes in agribusiness and other industries remained relevant, but the role shifted to understanding what buyers wanted and providing them with that value. In this, we saw the rise of “solutions” selling. Salespeople were taught that every product had features, advantages and benefits, but the focus needed to be more on the benefits rather than features. Salespeople memorized these benefits and spouted them as appropriate to customers based on their understanding of customer “pain points”. During this time, management-by-walking-around became the rage. Total Quality Management (TQM) was the predecessor of approaches like LEAN and Six Sigma. These approaches asked managers to look for exceptions to “best practices” and coached salespeople on how to improve their skills.
Up until the last year, I was often asked what would follow the market era. Because of the market era’s focus on customer needs, I could not fathom that there would be something that would displace it, but today…we know. It is no longer enough to respond to a customer’s needs; salespeople have to anticipate them. We are living in the “Predictive Era”, and this anticipation is not a guess, but instead based on a social and business relationship that has developed. Prediction requires salespeople to know the customer’s strategy, track customer behavior and understand how they respond to market dynamics, volatility and risk. Prediction also means knowing how the customer chooses between competing goals and interests.
In the predictive era, knowing the customer wants to make money isn’t deep enough knowledge. The need to anticipate customer problems and solutions in this new era has shifted the job of sales managers from a focus on coaching to a focus on truly managing. They must analyze sales and market data — not only the transaction data, but sales activity that leads to transactions —and identify how to allocate resources and determine if a good salesperson in a difficult territory is better than a bad salesperson in an easy territory. Managers in the predictive era have to develop salespeople, not based on the manager’s own previous success as a salesperson, but based on the maximum potential of a salesperson based on their possessed talents.
Here’s the thing, though…while we present these eras as historic, they’re not. We have products, companies and even industries that still operate in the product era, focused on telling people about products. There are a lot of individual salespeople and sales organizations that are built on the “get after it” sales approach, and there are many companies with great solutions who are still working on developing best practices. But as with all eras, sales organizations not in sync with the times often get displaced by those whose customers see them as more relevant.
It’s a whole new ballgame today…a whole new era. What comes next? I have no idea. It is likely that most of us will see the current era for the rest of our lives, or who knows, maybe there will be fundamental and systemic changes that move us forward more quickly. For now though, we’d better make sure we have all of the tools we need.
Beyond the blog
Learn more from Dr. Scott Downey at the Sales Management and Leadership professional development program on May 27-28, 2020. Attendees will assess their people development skills and gain tools for becoming a more effective coach for their team. Participants will also learn five keys to leading effective developmental conversations, practice handling situations such as retaining good salespeople, and learn to use assets they already possess to their greatest potential. Register now!
Tags: Agribusiness, Food, Management, Marketing, Sales, Sales Management and Leadership
Non-traditional Lenders in the Ag Credit Markets
Commercial banks and the Farm Credit System have been the dominant lenders to farmers for the past century, but new participants have entered the ag credit markets in recent years. This group includes ag input suppliers, and in more recent times, specialized collateral-based lenders that use land or other assets as the collateral for their farm loans. These “non-traditional lenders” have been consistently capturing market share in the agricultural credit markets since the 1980s financial crisis in agriculture. In 2019, they held almost 13% of the total farm sector debt (USDA) and accounted for 30% of the active loans based on data from the Kansas Farm Management Association. We know little about these non-traditional lenders because they do not face the same public reporting requirements as traditional lenders. The purpose of our study — Strategic Behavior of Non-traditional Lenders in the Agricultural Credit Markets — was to examine the credit products, operational performance and business models of these new players in the ag credit markets.
Farmers’ Purchasing Behavior and Implications for Suppliers’ Go-To-Market Strategies
Every four years, the Purdue University Center for Food and Agricultural Business conducts the Large Commercial Producer (LCP) survey, which collects data from approximately 2,000 farmers across the U.S. This survey has consistently shown that farmers behave differently when buying different inputs, meaning suppliers should be cognizant of these factors when designing their go-to-market strategies.
Creating Social Impact with an Eye Towards Profitability
One thing that has always been clear to those in agribusiness is how closely our communities and businesses are united. While other industries are beginning to realize that managing the ecosystem’s health is the right thing to do to sustain long-term business, farmers and food production organizations inherently understand this.